AI Models Comparison
Compare popular large language models across providers, pricing, capabilities, and performance.
Data verified: 2026-02-28How we collect this data →
Scores at a Glance
See full rankings →GPT-4o
OpenAI · LLM
8.8/10
Performance
9
Value
8.2
Reliability
9
Ease of Use
9.5
Best all-rounder. Unmatched ecosystem and ease of use.
Last verified: 2026-03-30 · How we score →
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic · LLM
8.6/10
Performance
9.5
Value
7.5
Reliability
9
Ease of Use
8.5
Top reasoning quality. Best for complex, high-stakes tasks.
Last verified: 2026-03-30 · How we score →
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google · LLM
8.6/10
Performance
8.8
Value
8.5
Reliability
8.5
Ease of Use
8.2
Excellent value. Best choice for Google Workspace teams.
Last verified: 2026-03-30 · How we score →
LLaMA 3.1 405B
Meta · LLM
7.8/10
Performance
8.5
Value
9.5
Reliability
6
Ease of Use
5
Best open-source model. Free to run, but requires infrastructure.
Last verified: 2026-03-30 · How we score →
Mistral Large
Mistral AI · LLM
8/10
Performance
8
Value
8.5
Reliability
7.5
Ease of Use
7.5
Strong European alternative with good price and GDPR compliance.
Last verified: 2026-03-30 · How we score →
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek · LLM
8.2/10
Performance
8.5
Value
9.5
Reliability
6.5
Ease of Use
7
Exceptional value. Strong performance at a fraction of the cost.
Last verified: 2026-03-30 · How we score →
Provider
All
← Swipe table left/right to see all columns →
| Feature |  GPT-4o |  Claude Opus 4 |  Gemini 2.5 Pro |  LLaMA 3.1 405B |  Mistral Large |  DeepSeek V3 |  Sonar Pro |  Mistral Large 3 |  GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General | |||||||||
| Provider | OpenAI | Anthropic | Meta | Mistral AI | DeepSeek | Perplexity | Mistral AI | OpenAI | |
| Release Date | May 2024 | May 2025 | Mar 2025 | Jul 2024 | Feb 2024 | Dec 2024 | Feb 2025 | Jul 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| Open Source | |||||||||
| Parameters | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | 405B | Undisclosed | 671B MoE | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Context & Tokens | |||||||||
| Max Context Window | 128K | 200K | 1M | 128K | 128K | 128K | 200K | 128K | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 16K | 32K | 65K | 4K | 8K | 8K | 8K | 16K | 32K |
| Pricing (per 1M tokens) | |||||||||
| Input Price | $2.50 | $15.00 | $1.25 | Free / Varies | $2.00 | $0.27 | $3.00 | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output Price | $10.00 | $75.00 | $10.00 | Free / Varies | $6.00 | $1.10 | $15.00 | $6.00 | $8.00 |
| Capabilities | |||||||||
| Vision (Image Input) | |||||||||
| Function / Tool Calling | |||||||||
| Code Generation | |||||||||
| Structured Output (JSON) | |||||||||
| System Prompts | |||||||||
| Streaming | |||||||||
| Fine-tuning Available | |||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||
| MMLU Score | 88.7% | ~90% | 90.0% | 88.6% | 84.0% | 88.5% | N/A | ~84% | 90.2% |
| HumanEval (Code) | 90.2% | ~93% | 89.0% | 89.0% | 81.0% | 82.6% | N/A | N/A | 92.0% |